RC.DEL/31/01/Rev.3
1 June
2001
ENGLISH
only
FORMAL
CONCLUSIONS OF THE CONFERENCE
1. The
States Parties to the Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe of
19 November 1990 met in a Review Conference in Vienna in accordance with Article XXI
of the Treaty, from 28 May to I June 2001, under the chairmanship of the
Republic of Italy.
2. The States Parties reaffirmed the fundamental role of the CFE Treaty
as a cornerstone
of European security and
their adherence to its goals
and objectives. They reaffirmed their
determination to fulfil in good faith all obligations
and commitments arising from the Treaty
and its associated documents.
The implementation of the Treaty since its entry into
force in 1992 has brought
positive results including significantly reduced holdings of Treaty‑limited
equipment and
increased confidence through transparency and predictability involving,
conventional armed
forces. The States Parties welcomed the impressive progress that had been made
in
implementing the Treaty, including the reduction of more than 59,000 pieces of
conventional
armaments and equipment, the exchange of about 6,000 notifications per year in
addition to
annual exchanges of information and the conduct of more than 3,300 on‑site
inspections and
observation visits to verify compliance with the provisions of the Treaty and
its associated
documents, With regard to the Concluding Act on Personnel Strength, the States
Parties
noted with satisfaction that the personnel strength of conventional armed forces
in the area of
application had been reduced significantly.
3. The
implementation of the Treaty and the Concluding Act have taken place in times
of change
during which the European security environment evolved significantly. As a result
of the common and cooperative efforts of the States
Parties, the Treaty and the Concluding
Act have remained vital stabilizing factors in the
period of transition and have contributed to
its peaceful unfolding and the enhancement of
security.
4. The States
parties reviewed the operation and implementation of the CFE Treaty and
its associated documents. They concluded that in
general the CFE Treaty was operating and
being implemented in a satisfactory manner. However,
there were a number of
implementation issues requiring further consideration and resolution
in the Joint Consultative
Group.
The States Parties noted that certain
numerical limitations established by the Treaty
were being exceeded. The States Parties were informed that the excess, which
had been
declared to be of a temporary nature, had been decreased. They expect that the
remaining
excess will be eliminated as soon as it is possible. They reaffirmed the
importance of
transparency with regard to the elimination of any excesses over CFE Treaty
limits. In this
context, they reiterated their commitment to full and continued implementation
of the Treaty
and its associated documents and their adherence to its numerical limitations.
The
States Parties noted that the Joint Consultative Group had not completely
fulfilled
the mandate assigned to it by the
First Review Conference to
update the Protocol on Existing
Types of Conventional Armaments and Equipment and called on the JCG to complete
this
task as quickly as
possible, in line with the agreement reached at the First Review Conference
that:
- any inaccuracies should be corrected,
including by removal of types, models and
versions of conventional armaments and equipment that do not meet Treaty
criteria;
- the Joint Consultative Group should
consider if an annual update of the list$ would be
appropriate;
- the Joint Consultative Group should
consider an electronic version of the lists in all
official languages.
The States
Parties reviewed efforts to deal with the problem of TLE unaccounted for
and uncontroIled within the area of application. Recalling the Final Document
of the First
CFE Review Conference and
mindful of the relevant provisions of the Agreement on
Adaptation of the CFE Treaty, the States Parties continued to express concern
about the
presence of such TLE within the area of application. They noted that
this situation adversely
affects the operation of the Treaty. They expressed their readiness to continue
to address this
issue in the Joint Consultative Group, as tasked by the First Review
Conference.
It addition, the States Parties raised
during the Review Conference certain
implementation issues which require further consideration in the JCG, including
among others:
- limitations and related Treaty obligations
- interpretation of Treaty counting rules
- notifications and exchange of information
- verification, including issues that have arisen during
inspections
- preparation for entry into force of the Agreement on
Adaptation and its
implementation.
5, The
States Parties recalled the signature of the Agreement on Adaptation by the
Heads
of State and Government of the States Parties and the
adoption of the CFE Final Act at the
OSCE Istanbul Summit on 19 November 1999.
The
Agreement on Adaptation reflects the new security environment and paves the
way to greater security and stability in Europe. The
adapted CFE Treaty will provide a new
structure of limitations to reflect changes that have
taken place in the political and military
situation in Europe; it will provide for enhanced
transparency and provisions pertaining to
host state consent to the presence of foreign forces.
The States Parties noted that a number of
implementation issues identified by the First Review
Conference were also addressed in the
context of the Agreement on
Adaptation. They recall
that, when the Agreement on
Adaptation enters into force, other participating States
of the OSCE whose land territory lies
in Europe within the geographic area between the
Atlantic Ocean and the Ural mountains,
will be able to apply for accession to the Treaty. They noted that this would
offer the
opportunity to extend the stability provided by the Treaty.
The
Adaptation Agreement will enter into force when it is ratified by all the
States
Parties. While they remain
committed to entry into force of the Agreement on Adaptation as
soon as possible, many States Parties have declared that ratification will be possible only in
the context of full and verifiable compliance with agreed
levels of conventional armaments
and equipment and
consistent with the
commitments contained in the CFE Final Act. Some
of them underlined, in particular, the commitments
referred to in the Istanbul Summit
Declaration. Other States
Parties have already ratified the Agreement or have stated that they
are about to do so and
urged other partners to join them soon
All States Parties referred to the importance they attach
to all the commitments in the
Final Act including its
Annexes. They reaffirmed their determination to fulfil in a timely
fashion, without exception all those commitments. They welcomed the progress achieved
and the assurances given towards the fulfillment of
these commitments and noted that
further
steps would be needed to meet established deadlines.
The
States Parties reaffirmed that all provisions of the Treaty, of the associated
documents and of the Concluding Act remain full in
effect and will continue to remain fully
in effect except those
provisions amended by the Agreement on Adaptation upon its entry
into force.
6. The States Parties welcomed
progress that had been made in carrying out tasks
identified in the First
Review Conference. Beyond successfully negotiating the Agreement on
Adaptation, the JCG had
made progress on technical preparations in view of entry into force
of the Adapted CFE Treaty.
The States Parties noted that the provisions of Annex E of
the Final Act of the First
Review Conference had been
carried out successfully. The total quantity of equipment
necessary to meet
commitments had been destroyed, and the necessary destruction of tanks
was continuing.
7. The States Parties expressed satisfaction with the
contributions the Treaty had made
and was continuing to make
to European security and voiced the hope that the third such
Conference would review
operation and implementation of the adapted CFE Treaty.